Whistle Blowing in the Public Sector – What is Government Ethics? Government Ethics Resources – Government Ethics – Focus Areas – Markkula Center for Applied Ethics – Santa Clara University #whistleblowing, #whistle #blowing, #whistle #blower, #whistleblower, #leak, #leaks


Whistle Blowing in the Public Sector

Judy Nadler and Miriam Schulman

These materials were prepared for the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics program in Government Ethics by Senior Fellow Judy Nadler and Communications Director Miriam Schulman. The Center provides training in local government ethics for public officials. For more information, contact Hana Callaghan .

What is the definition of whistle blowing?

According to George Kerevan, “Word of the Week” columnist for The Scotsman. “The etymological origins of whistle blowing are gloriously obscure.” Yet even without knowing the term’s pedigree, we get a vivid picture from the words themselves. Kerevan suggests the obvious one—a police officer shrilling on a whistle when he or she catches a crime in progress.

Whistle blowing means calling attention to wrongdoing that is occurring within an organization. The Government Accountability Project lists four ways to blow the whistle:

reporting wrongdoing or a violation of the law to the proper authorities.

such as a supervisor, a hotline or an Inspector General

refusing to participate in workplace wrongdoing

testifying in a legal proceeding

leaking evidence of wrongdoing to the media

Of course, whistle blowing goes on in the private sector, where some of the most famous figures include former Enron Vice President Sherron Watkins and tobacco executive Jeffrey Wigand. But because government, by its very nature, is supposed to be open and transparent, full disclosure of unethical or illegal behavior in the public sphere is particularly important. Not all of the problems in the public sphere are, however, generated within the government organization; outside vendors, contractors, and individuals can participate in and even breed government corruption.

What does whistle blowing have to do with ethics?

A whistle blower once testified in a California court about how his boss had regularly ordered him to discard some of the company’s toxic waste into a local storm drain rather than dispose of it properly. Why, the judge wanted to know, had the man finally decided to step forward after having participated in this illegal dumping for years. “Well,” the man explained, “I was fishing with my grandson, and it suddenly occurred to me that the waste I was dumping was going to pollute the water so that he might never be able to go fishing with his grandson.”

Whistle blowing has to do with ethics because it represents a person’s understanding, at a deep level, that an action his or her organization is taking is harmful—that it interferes with people’s rights or is unfair or detracts from the common good. Whistle blowing also calls upon the virtues, especially courage, as standing up for principles can be a punishing experience. Even though laws are supposed to protect whistle blowers from retaliation, people who feel threatened by the revelations can ostracize the whistle blower, marginalizing or even forcing him or her out of public office. On the other hand, there have been occasions when the role of whistle blower has actually catapulted people into higher office and has earned the respect of constituents. (eg?)

How can government encourage whistle blowing?

In an article about whistle blowing in a business context. Lilanthi Ravishankar makes a useful distinction between external and internal whistle blowing. She argues that companies should encourage internal whistle blowing so that problems are solved within the organization before employees feel they must go outside to get action. The same is true for government bodies, which need to know about problems early—before illegal contracts must be renegotiated or aquifers have been polluted or the public’s money has been squandered or unethical behavior has become front-page news.

She makes several suggestions about how to encourage internal whistle blowing in companies. We repeat some of them here, with slight modifications for a government context:

  • Create a policy about reporting illegal or unethical practices, which should include:
    • Formal mechanisms for reporting violations, such as hotlines and mailboxesÿ
    • Clear communications about the process of voicing concerns, such as a specific chain of command, or the identification of a specific person to handle complaints
    • Clear communications about bans on retaliation
  • Get endorsement of the policy from top officials—mayor, manager, councilmembers, boards—and publicize the organization’s commitment to the process. Elected and administrative leadership must encourage ethical behavior and hold everyone within the organization to the highest standards, including the disclosure of activities that would have a negative impact on the public’s business.
  • Investigate and follow up promptly on all allegations of misconduct. Report on these investigations to the council or board.

What ethical dilemmas does whistle blowing present?

When a person encounters wrongdoing in the public sphere, his or her first step should probably be to use the organization’s internal whistle blowing mechanisms. William Black, professor of law and economics at University of Missouri-Kansas City, was himself a whistle blower when he worked as a Savings and Loan regulator in the 1980s. During a term as visiting scholar at the Ethics Center, he wrote about his experience:

Whistle blowers in the public sector often face the unique problem that their disclosure may constitute a crime. This can create an ethical dilemma when the ongoing misconduct is severe and there is no reasonable prospect that the abuse will end absent blowing the whistle….I would still recommend trying to get the responsible organs (e.g. your agency’s/department’s congressional oversight committees and/or inspector general) to take action first unless the threat to public safety was imminent.

All government bodies should have fairly straightforward lines of authority. For example, if a councilperson has a problem with city staff, he or she would go to the city manager. If an employee of the water district sees wrongdoing, he or she would start with a supervisor and move up the chain of command, and so forth. It’s always best to start with the mechanisms the organization has set up to deal with problems because these represent the best chance at an amicable solution.

If this process does not produce results, however, it’s not enough to say, “Well, I did my best.” If wrongdoing is not being addressed within the organization, it may be time to move outside—to the district attorney, the grand jury, or to the press.

Kirk Hanson, Ethics Center executive director, and Jerry Ceppos, former vice president/news, Knight-Ridder, have written on the ethics of leaking information to the press and suggest these considerations:

The first thing a potential leaker should ask is the status of the information itself. Is the information “classified,” “proprietary,” or otherwise “protected?” Is there a system in place which clearly considers this information restricted? If the information is clearly intended to be protected, then the leaker must meet a stiff test if he or she wants to leak it.

The second consideration is whether the potential leaker has a specific obligation, legal or ethical, to protect the information, or has the information only because another person violated his or her obligation to keep it secret. If so, then it is a much more serious matter to reveal it.

The third consideration is whether the information is about public or private matters. Information about another’s sexual orientation, about his or her private finances, or about personal phone calls has more of a claim to privacy than information about a person’s actions as a corporate executive or a government official. The difficult cases, of course, are those where the private life of individuals arguably influences their public actions.

Hanson and Ceppos also argue that potential leakers must assess the good and harm their leak may do. When lives are at stake or millions of public dollars are being misappropriated, those concerns for the public good trump the harm to personal privacy or government secrecy.

On the other hand, a leaker must determine if the conduct he or she is exposing represents actual wrongdoing or if it is simply represents a policy disagreement. Of course, much of the public’s business should be debated in public, and speaking up about disagreements on most issues is not only acceptable but also desirable. Closed-door sessions, however, are secret for a reason. Revelations about a city’s interest in a particular piece of property may boost the price of that parcel. Exposure of sensitive information about a hiring or firing decision may needlessly cause harm to an individual. As much as council or board members’ views may differ on these issues, they should remain secret if the problem does not rise to the level of misconduct.

Oct 23, 2015

IRS Whistleblower Attorney #business #tax #fraud, #corporate #tax #fraud, #fraud #on #taxes, #internal #revenue #service #whistleblower, #irs #fraud #report, #irs #fraud #reporting, #irs #fraud #whistleblower, #irs #report #fraud, #irs #report #tax #evasion, #irs #report #tax #fraud, #irs #reporting #tax #evasion, #irs #reporting #tax #fraud, #irs #tax #fraud #report, #irs #whistle #blower, #irs #whistle #blowers, #irs #whistleblower, #irs #whistleblowers, #report #business #tax #fraud, #report #irs #fraud, #report #irs #tax #fraud, #report #tax #evasion, #report #tax #evasion #to #irs, #report #tax #fraud, #report #tax #fraud #online, #report #tax #fraud #to #irs, #reporting #income #tax #evasion, #reporting #irs #fraud, #reporting #tax #evasion, #reporting #tax #fraud, #reporting #tax #fraud #irs, #tax #evasion #reporting, #tax #evasion #whistleblower, #tax #fraud, #tax #fraud #report, #tax #fraud #whistleblower, #tax #whistleblower, #whistleblower #fraud,irs #whistleblower #attorney, #irs, #accounting, #fraud, #underpayment, #lawyer, #law #firm, #washington, #d.c., #new #york, #boston, #hartford, #miami, #chicago, #seattle, #san #francisco, #los #angeles, #dallas, #houston, #miami, #new #york, #massachusetts, #connecticut, #florida, #texas, #illinois, #washington, #california, #florida


Welcome to The Ferraro Law Firm – Tax Whistleblower Attorneys

Important News:

An IRS whistleblower submission filed in the infancy of the program by The Ferraro Law Firm resulted in a $38 Million award for one of our clients.

At The Ferraro Law Firm. those with information about tax underpayments can get the same high-quality representation that the largest corporations and wealthiest individuals enjoy. Big corporations and the super-rich spend millions of dollars on outside tax controversy counsel. The reason is that businesses need to defend the very types of underpayments you have discovered. With that in mind, ask yourself if it might not be time you had a tax whistleblower lawyer working for you—someone with the same type of experience who can fight effectively to protect your interests?

The IRS Whistleblower statute gives anyone with information about large-scale tax underpayments, including accounting errors, tax fraud or evasion, a significant financial incentive to report it. The IRS must give you up to 30% of any money they collect based upon your information.

If you believe that you have such information, contact The Ferraro Law Firm in Miami, Florida, for a confidential consultation.

Our tax whistleblower attorneys have over $100 billion in active IRS whistleblower submissions, and years of experience handling tax controversies and other complex tax matters for some of the world’s largest corporations and wealthiest individuals while practicing at some of the country’s largest and most prominent tax law firms. As a result, they know exactly what an IRS whistleblower case entails and exactly how to take a case from beginning to end and guarantee maximum results. Today, their practice focuses on helping IRS whistleblowers maximize their rewards while protecting themselves from the underpaying taxpayers.

Our tax attorneys practice exclusively in the area of IRS whistleblower claims and have hundreds of cases under their belt. We don’t do this part time, so you get experienced attorneys versed in the tax law and IRS procedures that directly apply to you case.

More than anything, we know you want your case taken seriously and that maximizing your reward is of the utmost importance. We would like you to know, sincerely, that this is something we do every day for the people we represent. Learn more about reporting tax fraud .

Confidential Consultations, Nationwide Practice — 1-800-275-3332

We invite you to explore the rest of this website to learn more about the IRS Whistleblower Rewards program and other relevant topics. We also invite you to call or contact our lawyers directly at either our Washington, D.C. or Miami, Florida, area offices.

Halunen Law Employment & Whistleblower Attorneys #whistle #blower #attorneys


A Formidable Group of Attorneys

An Established Commitment to Employees, Consumers, and Whistleblowers

With offices in Minneapolis and Chicago, the law firm of Halunen Law offers highly experienced legal representation in matters related to employment law, government fraud, and consumer rights across the country.

Our team includes attorneys certified by the Minnesota State Bar Association as Labor and Employment Law Specialists, Minnesota Super Lawyers, and lawyers with AV* Preeminent peer ratings from Martindale-Hubbell. Members of the firm regularly speak locally, regionally and nationally in their respective legal fields.

Our dedicated and enthusiastic staff members are also integral to our team. Together we work to achieve the best result possible for our clients.



Contact us to get your important legal questions answered. We offer a free, confidential, consultation to all potential clients.

*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc. used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards.

Practice Areas

Blog Posts

Halunen Law attorneys Benjamin Kwan and Amy Boyle participated in the Federal Bar Association Young Lawyers Di.

President Abraham Lincoln enacted the False Claims Act during the Civil War when bullets were filled with sawd.

MINNEAPOLIS – (April 3, 2017) Halunen Law has named Melissa Wolchansky as an equity partner in the Minneapol.

Halunen Law Partner, and Chair of the consumer class action practice group, Melissa Wolchansky was invited to.

It’s no secret; Halunen Law has an exceptional team of attorneys helping consumers, whistleblowers, and empl.

Titled \”This Summer and Beyond,\” the Affinity Bar Student Job Symposium gave law students a unique opportunit.

I get calls several times a week from executives and professionals who want me to review a severance agreement.

New data from the Minnesota Lawyer Registration Office indicates that lawyers of color are significantly under.

In the ever-evolving world of consumer purchasing, companies are placing contracts in increasingly inconspicu.

If you are a service member, especially a National Guard reservist, you may have questions about how, or even.